AI HIRING ASSESSMENT PLATFORM
Trusted by 500+ enterprise hiring partners — 50,000+ completed rounds, 99.4% proctoring accuracy, and a 4.9/5 candidate experience rating.
One proctored assessment validates your technical skills and gives you a verifiable score report — recruiters see proof, not promises.
The platform replaces resume keyword filtering with proctored, role-specific assessments that measure actual technical ability: an AI resume parse, a technical MCQ round, hands-on coding in an in-browser editor graded by real test cases, and a live AI-conducted interview.
Recruiters and engineering leads get verified skill scores, AI-conducted interviews, complete proctoring logs, and percentile benchmarks — before the first screening call. Managing candidates takes place in a tracking dashboard with expiring invitation links.
An AI hiring assessment platform for technical recruiting. It runs proctored skill assessments — technical MCQs, coding tests, and AI-conducted interviews — and turns the results into one verified score report recruiters can trust.
Every round runs under AI proctoring: webcam face detection, multiple-face and look-away alerts, tab-switch and fullscreen-exit tracking, microphone noise monitoring, and dual-monitor detection. All proctoring violations are logged and surfaced in the score report.
Four graded rounds: a technical multiple-choice round, short-answer questions, hands-on coding in an in-browser editor with real test cases, and a live AI interview. Together they measure knowledge, reasoning, implementation, and communication.
The AI interviewer conducts a real-time spoken interview with role-specific questions, evaluates answers as the candidate speaks, and produces a transcript with scores, which appear in the final score report alongside the other rounds.
Recruiters receive a verified score report with round-wise breakdowns and percentile benchmarks, complete proctoring and violation logs, and a dashboard for managing candidates and tracking assessment pipelines.
Yes. All four rounds are fully responsive and run on mobile browsers. Proctored rounds still require camera and microphone access, so a quiet, well-lit space is recommended.
Resume screening relies on keywords and self-reported claims, while structured assessments measure demonstrated ability. Selection research, including the Schmidt and Hunter meta-analysis, finds structured assessments substantially more predictive of job performance than unstructured interviews or resume review.
Source: Schmidt & Hunter (1998) meta-analysis on selection-method validity
Contact: support@talentiq.app · Content last updated · © TalentIQ Inc. All rights reserved.